Subject:
|
Re: No evil people
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:05:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
313 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GM87Jw.Iry@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Carl Watson writes:
>
> > Yes thanks.
> >
> > I do not deny the existence of evil.
> > IMO evil is a description of an action.
> > I believe there are evildoer's but not evil people.
> > What do you think?
>
> I think that there ARE evil people. Here are a few candidates for you to
> consider:
>
> Pol Pot. Joseph McCarthy. Joseph Stalin. Jeffrey Dahmer.
>
> (that last one, some will argue is a mentally ill person, but I'm not sure
> one way or the other... it's a candidate list not an assertion list)
IMO all those people performed evil acts.
How do you define an 'evil person'? How do you define evil?
Can someone perform evil acts & not be an evil person.
Is an 'evil person' always evil? Where they born evil?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: No evil people
|
| (...) Candidate definition: Someone who consistently performs evil acts, knowing that under objective morality they are evil. (...) Well, I guess I'd want to hear your definition, since you presumably have one since you agreed with me on the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: No evil people
|
| (...) I think that there ARE evil people. Here are a few candidates for you to consider: Pol Pot. Joseph McCarthy. Joseph Stalin. Jeffrey Dahmer. (that last one, some will argue is a mentally ill person, but I'm not sure one way or the other... it's (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
