Subject:
|
Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:16:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
267 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > Ban him. Shun him. Send him emails and tell him to shut up.
> > >
> > > I hate to repeat, but take your own advice. Don't bother responding to
> > > useless posts. It brings your own image WAY down. As far as I'm concerned
> > > he's only a part of the problem. Stop encouraging it.
> >
> > Meaning what? I am to ignore every slur he makes so he gets away with his
> > lies scot free?
>
> Is he to ignor the slurs and accusations you have made against him?
> Isn't that exactly why he keeps asking you to show where he lied?
I did. He chose to deny it was a lie. At that point it's a difference of
opinion, I suppose, but you cannot say that I did not show it.
> Yes I read the "supposed" lie you accuse him of. Seems to me the title you
> gave this thread is a lie of the same magnitude. "14 posts by Scott just now"
When I posted that, what I had to go on was the timestamps on the posts. As
LFB said, they are ALL from a very short period of time.
> - you can read as well as everyone else, that they were posted over
> a period of 2 days.
No. Claimed to have been queued up for posting, yes, but they were posted in
a short period of time. Go look for yourself. I'm even willing to allow that
Scott confirms days old proposed posts without looking to see if they're
still relevant or worth posting, but my subject line, as it stands, (He
caused 14 posts to happen "just now", after all) is correct, factual, and
non pejorative, unlike "White Man's Club" which is counterfactual and
pejorative.
> I agree with David - continued requests to ban him will most likely get
> both of you banned.
If you choose to throw the baby out with the bathwater that's your choice, I
guess. Most people are smarter than that though.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Come on, Lar, to ban either of you would be to throw out the baby with the bathwater. We all know it bothers Scott that you made a comment about his making fourteen posts at once, snide or not, just as we know it bothers you that he called the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Because it is not a lie. You know it. I know it. (...) The truth is not about opinion! (...) "Claimed" - to you have any other explanation? (...) I think they were all still relevant? Had you answered any of the points elswhere? (...) *Sigh* (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Because it is not a lie. You know it. I know it. I noticed you have not replied to this one, where I ask about your "lies": (URL) At that point it's a difference of (...) The truth is not about opinion! (...) "Claimed" - to you have any other (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Is he to ignor the slurs and accusations you have made against him? Isn't that exactly why he keeps asking you to show where he lied? Its a two way street. Yet you continue to call him a liar and beg for his banishment. (...) community. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
