Subject:
|
Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:21:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
203 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> I agree. Let's stop encouraging it. Only reply to his posts if they're worth
> your time. Agreed?
And only respond to theft if the item's big enough to worry about? Works for
TARGET. Doesn't work for me, though. It encourages the notion that small
thefts are OK.
If it's OK for theft, is it ok for antisocial behaviour? I ignore minor
antisocial behaviour when displayed by 3 year olds, because I assume they
have parents that will correct them. There is no enforcement mechanism here.
Ban him.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Ah, but while petty theft may still be wrong, is it worth capital punishment? Or maybe just cutting off their hands? Is it worth the time? (...) Should we expect one? Aren't you always on the side of retaining people's liberties? Suppose "the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Would you rather play the part of the o-t.debate police? Do you feel obligated to correct *everyone*? Assuming yes, should we always assume that when you DON'T reply that that means you find nothing wrong with the statements made? Should you (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
