To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14383
14382  |  14384
Subject: 
Re: Can't Drive 65 (was 'Re: Tolerance of vice')
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:02:35 GMT
Viewed: 
440 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

<snip>

The theory of how to set speeds isn't just some neato thing I dreamed up,
it's commonly accepted practice, as outlined in Transportation Engineering
texts... you can look it up or take my word for it (I remember reading it in
mine, and again in some Michigan DOT documentation I happened to be
reviewing when I was on an MDOT project). Whichever you choose.

Larry is claiming that residents of an area shouldn't 'artificially' lower the
speed limit so that they can post officers and ticket travellers-through.  I
think that whoever owns the road should set the speed limits and the fines for
violating them.  And I think generally that small roads should be owned by
those who own land on the road cooperatively.  And I would have guessed that
Larry agreed with that.

I DO!

*If* we're talking about private roads, that is. With private roads, the
owners of course can set whatever rules they like, and people will vote with
their feet (or in this case, their steering wheels :-) ). But we're talking
about PUBLIC roads here. Hence, the drivers of the road are as good an
approximation of the owners as you're likely to get, certainly far better
than any random bureaucrat would be.

So how do we mix political issues and engineering
issues and come out with a good solution.

Privatize the roads? :-) Said tongue in cheek of course. I don't advocate
privatizing the roads till all the easier stuff is done first. Which may
never come to pass, I'm realistic enough to realise that.

++Lar (the one and only, accept no substitutes)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Can't Drive 65 (was 'Re: Tolerance of vice')
 
(...) Hmm Civil engineering. This does work for some roads, but, for most, the 85th percentile speed just keeps rising (if my memory serves my right). For most roads, all the 85th percentile rule shows is that 15 percent of drivers are willing to (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Can't Drive 65 (was 'Re: Tolerance of vice')
 
(...) Who are smart enough to know what level or risk is appropriate in all situations. Right? (...) The 'correct' speed. (...) What Larry is saying is that while they might be exceeding the posted speed limit, the problem is that the posted speed (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

36 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR