Subject:
|
Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:58:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
245 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Ban him. Shun him. Send him emails and tell him to shut up.
> >
> > I hate to repeat, but take your own advice. Don't bother responding to
> > useless posts. It brings your own image WAY down. As far as I'm concerned
> > he's only a part of the problem. Stop encouraging it.
>
> Meaning what? I am to ignore every slur he makes so he gets away with his
> lies scot free?
Is he to ignor the slurs and accusations you have made against him? Isn't that
exactly why he keeps asking you to show where he lied? Its a two way street.
Yet you continue to call him a liar and beg for his banishment.
> No. EVERYONE has to shun him or tell him to stop, or send him mail when he's
> being a twit. If that happened I could shun him too. But right now he gets
> away with far too much here and elsewhere on LUGNET. It's bad for the
community.
"EVERYONE has to shun him" - Larry, isn't that just a bit neurotic? The
impression I get from reading through all this drivel is that you refuse to
show where he explicitely lied; that you have deemed him unworthy of a
response; and that rather than answer his single request, you respond with
further slurs by continuing to call him a liar.
Yes I read the "supposed" lie you accuse him of. Seems to me the title you
gave this thread is a lie of the same magnitude. "14 posts by Scott just now"
- you can read as well as everyone else, that they were posted over a period of
2 days.
I agree with David - continued requests to ban him will most likely get both of
you banned.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) But it makes it a community. (...) I'm reading this in a similar way. Your losing points in my book everytime you say 'shun him', 'ban him', etc. Denying response to difficult or 'unworthy' questions aren't good debate rules. (...) think of (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) I did. He chose to deny it was a lie. At that point it's a difference of opinion, I suppose, but you cannot say that I did not show it. (...) When I posted that, what I had to go on was the timestamps on the posts. As LFB said, they are ALL (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 14 posts by Scott just now
|
| (...) Meaning what? I am to ignore every slur he makes so he gets away with his lies scot free? No. EVERYONE has to shun him or tell him to stop, or send him mail when he's being a twit. If that happened I could shun him too. But right now he gets (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
