Subject:
|
Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:33:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
785 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> Is there a "wrong way"?
Optimization for local conditions can be suboptimal for global.
I would hold that humanity's chief survival weapon is cleverness. Anything
that selects against cleverness/intelligence/drive (the cited example, for
instance) is bad for humanity's long term survival potential.
Citing another bumper sticker (a personal fave...): "Be worried. Somewhere,
right now, stupid people are breeding"
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
|
| (...) However, many species manage to survive (& flourish) without cleverness, simply be breeding a lot. My point to Scott was I don't think right & wrong have any relevance to evolution - local populations may evolve in ways which are advantageous (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
