Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:51:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
397 times
|
| |
|
|
Yo Anthony, I have'nt read this whole thread, but i don't want to see you
leave! Suffice to say there are alot of Smarties out there who like to put
their two cents in...it's tough to deal with......but for the rest of
us....don't go!
Eric
In lugnet.castle, Anthony Sava writes:
> Lugnet has a problem.
>
> No one can have their own opinion if it differs from everyone elses.
>
> If they do, they are attacked. Read the posts that were in reply to my own,
> stating my discontent with the re-release of the Castle set the Guarded Inn.
> Because I don't rate that set highly and would rather see another in its place,
> I am branded a 'complainer about all that lego does.'
>
> Well here is my response to that.
>
> Citizens of Lugnet, this is one AFOL that will no longer be posting to lugnet
> unless it deals directly with his own website. Why? Because if YOU don't care
> about what I have to say, then I have no reason to say anything, do I? Don't
> think this is some isolated case, either. I have stated my opinions all over
> lugnet, and I am either looked over, ignored, or beaten down. Forgive me for
> being me. In all reality, I should never post again, as I cannot see a really
> good reason to. But because there are the select few whom I care about here on
> lugnet, and they care about me, I would think, I shall not leave entirely. As
> for the rest of you, well, I hope God gives you the good graces to understand
> those who are just a little different than the pack.
>
> To Lego Direct, I never said rereleasing sets was a bad idea. I just think you
> could have picked a MUCH better set than the Guarded Inn that represented the
> castle line.
>
> And that is my final two cents.
>
> --Anthony Sava
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
