Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:44:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
396 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Anthony Sava writes:
> Lugnet has a problem.
>
> No one can have their own opinion if it differs from everyone elses.
>
> If they do, they are attacked. Read the posts that were in reply to my own,
> stating my discontent with the re-release of the Castle set the Guarded Inn.
> Because I don't rate that set highly and would rather see another in its place,
> I am branded a 'complainer about all that lego does.'
>
> Well here is my response to that.
>
> Citizens of Lugnet, this is one AFOL that will no longer be posting to lugnet
> unless it deals directly with his own website. Why? Because if YOU don't care
> about what I have to say, then I have no reason to say anything, do I? Don't
> think this is some isolated case, either. I have stated my opinions all over
> lugnet, and I am either looked over, ignored, or beaten down. Forgive me for
> being me. In all reality, I should never post again, as I cannot see a really
> good reason to. But because there are the select few whom I care about here on
> lugnet, and they care about me, I would think, I shall not leave entirely. As
> for the rest of you, well, I hope God gives you the good graces to understand
> those who are just a little different than the pack.
>
> To Lego Direct, I never said rereleasing sets was a bad idea. I just think you
> could have picked a MUCH better set than the Guarded Inn that represented the
> castle line.
>
> And that is my final two cents.
>
> --Anthony Sava
Welcome to the real world
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
