Subject:
|
Re: This makes me SICK!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:22:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
345 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.market.auction, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> > DaveE and Bryan Wong (1) together have it backwards.
> >
> > Putting information in the listing about where to get it cheaper *is*
> > against the eBay TOS. Example provided by DaveE (quoted below).
Well-- I just heard back from Ebay and they seem to disagree... they said
"We have ... determined that the auction falls within our policy
guidelines"... they didn't really say why or anything...
DaveE
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: This makes me SICK!
|
| (...) Interesting. They have the final say, but I think they should reword their written policy since it is misleading at best. And it does make possible a $0.27 auction for the same information, if that is something you feel like doing. ($0.27 will (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.auction)
| | | Re: This makes me SICK!
|
| Someone could also watch who bids on this particular auction. Then email the high bidder with "visit walmart.com" and then they could have the chance to retract their bid. "David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: This makes me SICK!
|
| (...) Huh... didn't know that... I wonder if putting a link would be ok, seeing as it's not content which should fall under jurisdiction of Ebay-- tho the link itself would be... Something along the lines of: "<a href=www.walmart.com>Click here to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
