Subject:
|
Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 05:15:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1075 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > All well and good but if you are not looking at my MOCS for sale, you are
> > missing out on a pretty good share of my MOC output these days.
>
> The horror, the horror...maybe I'll actually survive being thusly deprived.
I have no doubt of it. You're not a trainhead. That's not the point though.
The point is what I said. If you want (and I am not saying you should or
should not, that is your choice) to see what I'm up to creatively, that's
where you are going to have to look, for the most part. No different than
what any other artist for hire might point out. But it erodes your argument
against commercialism which is why I pointed it out.
> > So keep an eye on the market groups because that's where they get posted.
> > (which I support)
>
> And we would know this because you managed to post twice
Once by mistake and subsequently cancelled, did you catch that part, or does
that erode your argument too?
> to the newsgroup
> lugnet.lego.direct with essentially irrelevent marketplace material? Or are
> you just helping me make a point about newsgroup abuse?
Neither. Merely clarifying and correcting false statements on your part.
> I realize I opened the door to this, but it is also the case that you did
> not resist the temptation. Apparently it was not so easy to resist this
> tempation.
There was no "temptation" to resist. You mentioned my organization
(incorrectly spelled and capitalised) and what I do in a way that leaves a
false impression and I corrected your usage and your false impression. That
is all.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
