Subject:
|
Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:56:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
778 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > If that were the case, you'd see tons of market postings in non-market groups,
> > since they have the same temptation. I see the very occasional post, and thats
> > about it.
>
> The difference is that the the average LUGNET poster isn't representing a
> multi-national brick seller and are not employed for the express purpose of
> advancing the profit margin of that brick seller.
I'd disagree. For TLC, we (the online AFOLs) are not the most important
buyers, not by a long ways (see your description below of us as a teeny tiny
demographic). For the random Bricklink seller, or e-bayer, or whatever, the
online AFOLs are the ONLY buyers. As such, it is the random individual
seller who has a much greater impetus to spam outside of marketplace groups.
> Even if they lost their LUGNET posting privileges altogether, so what?
> Would TLC really care if they weren't allowed to post 2 or 3 message per
> month on a site catering to a teeny tiny demographic?
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
