Subject:
|
RE: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? (sarcasm warning)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:29:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<marco@soporcel.ptIHATESPAM>
|
Viewed:
|
867 times
|
| |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----> Of Dave Schuler
> The purpose of default LUGNET user's presence on LUGNET is
> to exchange
> information in a forum for people who share in the hobby.
> While it is true
> that many LUGNET users also sell bricks, this for the most
> part isn't their
> sole vocation and isn't generally their entire purpose for
> being on LUGNET.
> TLC, and by extension any TLC employee who posts in an
> official capacity,
> represents the interest of TLC, which is to sell product. I
> don't suggest
> that TLC employees can't contribute to LUGNET in a
> non-official capacity,
> but if they post *as* employees then their posts are by
> definition part of
> the TLC marketing presence on LUGNET.
Yes, but why not use the same "rules" used to anyone abusing the LUGNET ?
i.e. If any TLC employee *OR* any other LUGNETter starts using this resource
against the LUGNET spirit, after the 1st warning, should be "banned" for a
while. This would be a reverse solution compared to the actual one, where LD
is "banned" from every other but lugnet.lego.* forum.
mc.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
