Subject:
|
Re: Naming conventions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Jun 2000 03:48:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.chem.*Spamless*tulane.edu
|
Viewed:
|
1193 times
|
| |
|
|
If there is a naming convention I doubt it is official. When I was there nothing
was refered to by name; everything was done by number. No one ever said "Chris,
get on that fork lift and go get us 6 boxes of yellow 2x4 bricks." It was always
"Get xxxx-xx". Sorry, I don't even remember the color codes. I did drop a box of
10,000 little gears once (the little gears which fit inside the old differential
housing, try to figure out what gear I am talking about).
Chris
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, John Gerlach writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Brian Lanning writes:
> > > In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > >
> > > > TLG would be smart to adopt our nomenclature. Not Todd's but rather LDraw's
> > > > nomenclature. Warts and all.
> > >
> > > Agreed. It's a very good naming convention. As clear as one could get under
> > > the circumstances.
> >
> > As opposed to the naming conventions that LEGO has used internally for years?
>
> That would be fine too... IF it was one rather than many, and IF it was shared
> with us.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Naming conventions
|
| (...) nothing (...) "Chris, (...) always (...) Fine. Tell us what the values of xxxx-xx are for all parts, LD, please. We'll use those. We just need to reduce this tower of Babel. ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
