Subject:
|
Re: Naming conventions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:04:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1205 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, John Gerlach writes:
> > Agreed. It's a very good naming convention. As clear as one could get under
> > the circumstances.
>
> As opposed to the naming conventions that LEGO has used internally for years?
>
> How about, instead of suggesting that LEGO change the way they refer to parts,
> why not ask them to share *their* naming conventions with the AFOL community?
Do they have an internal naming convention? Is it in english or danish? Why
are the thin walls train windows according to them? They were used in a lot
of places. I doubt they have anything that formal. If they do, I'd certainly
like to hear it. It would make things easier if everyone used the same names.
brian
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Naming conventions
|
| (...) As opposed to the naming conventions that LEGO has used internally for years? How about, instead of suggesting that LEGO change the way they refer to parts, why not ask them to share *their* naming conventions with the AFOL community? JohnG, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
