Subject:
|
Re: Naming conventions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:52:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, John Gerlach writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Brian Lanning writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > TLG would be smart to adopt our nomenclature. Not Todd's but rather LDraw's
> > > nomenclature. Warts and all.
> >
> > Agreed. It's a very good naming convention. As clear as one could get under
> > the circumstances.
>
> As opposed to the naming conventions that LEGO has used internally for years?
That would be fine too... IF it was one rather than many, and IF it was shared
with us.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Naming conventions
|
| If there is a naming convention I doubt it is official. When I was there nothing was refered to by name; everything was done by number. No one ever said "Chris, get on that fork lift and go get us 6 boxes of yellow 2x4 bricks." It was always "Get (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Naming conventions
|
| (...) As opposed to the naming conventions that LEGO has used internally for years? How about, instead of suggesting that LEGO change the way they refer to parts, why not ask them to share *their* naming conventions with the AFOL community? JohnG, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
