Subject:
|
Re: Digital camera
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:39:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1153 times
|
| |
|
|
> He was getting a dollar until he came home and told me that in a comparison of
> classmates' allowances, the lowest anyone else got was $3 and there were kids
> getting $6 or $7. So I bumped it up to $3. I DO think it is excessive because
> once you figure in the LEGO factor-- as a kid of an AFOL (or simply FOL) he
> hardly needs to spend any money on LEGO, yet his collection is huge for a kid
> his age because he and his little brother usually get a copy of any set I find
> on clearance as well as others I'm simply curious about. Not to mention all
> the parts they have managed to siphon from MY collection.
WOW!!!! $3 a week, plus "unlimited" lego.... :)
I wish I got that when I was a kid. I got money from relatives, and managed
the odd job here and there, plus LEGO wasn't that bad back then. You could
buy a real nice lego set for even $10.
So I guess there is a trade-off.
Benjamin Medinets
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Digital camera
|
| (...) He was getting a dollar until he came home and told me that in a comparison of classmates' allowances, the lowest anyone else got was $3 and there were kids getting $6 or $7. So I bumped it up to $3. I DO think it is excessive because once you (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
