General Discussion : 31179


General / 31179	31178 \| 31180

Subject:	Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:55:36 GMT
Viewed:	87 times

In lugnet.admin.nntp, Daniel Staudt writes: > while i understand the need for this system i think it would be easyer on > alot of people if it (maybe as an option") simply did a reply send to > verify the message instead of clikcing on a link, waiting for your browser > to open, reading the message, and clicking on the right button. I think the issue with a reply is that, unless something specific was required to entered into the mail, it is too easy to put replies on automatic pilot by automating the reply with a rule in your mail program. As soon as you do that, you have the spoofhole again. My thinking is the essence of this scheme is that it requires positive action of some sort on your part to work.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message . (...) browser (...) Excuse me for just suggesting this option in another mail. I don't agree. A very simple way is to make the header look like this: Message_id 54dfDF7_&2532))sdrt4325ds which still is readable (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Email Authentication - Why not make it optional?
while i understand the need for this system i think it would be easyer on alot of people if it (maybe as an option") simply did a reply send to verify the message instead of clikcing on a link, waiting for your browser to open, reading the message, (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)

42 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search