Subject:
|
Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:54:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1400 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.general, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> > Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
[...]
> True, if someone actually clicks on the URL and goes to the site, they'll
> definitely understand that it's not spam. Yet, it's reasonable to cut • someone
> some slack who didn't recognize the poster's name and who didn't see the
> characters "lego" embedded in the URL. Certainly, based on the content of • the
> message posting, it was one of the most spam-looking things seen here in a • long
> time.
Of course, let's remember where "here" is; namely LUGNet, a moderated
(however lightly) private service where true spammers can not get to due to
the registration requirement (someone correct me if I'm wrong on this).
I agree, however, that there is no need to charbroil Keith. A light
toasting was sufficient. ;-D
Ob Lego:
I guess I better introduce myself and say hi to the group (as this is my
first post in lugnet.general). I'm a 27 year old Lego maniac, whose dark
ages were 87-98. Classic space, classic Town, and all Castle are my
interests. Been reading RTL since July 98 (never posted, probably never
will) and have been lurking on LUGNet since it was opened to the public. I
figured it was about time another voice entered the fray, so to speak. It
is nice to meet all of you.
Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
|
| So! OK, everybody. Get this! I'm like away in NYC for a week. Havin' a fine time. I'm playing with toys, slurpin' beverages with other LEGO folks. MEANWHILE... this is going on (!!!!!) "Timothy D. Freshly" wrote: [snip] (...) Good heavens. That's (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
|
| (...) I think you're arguing whether or not it "should" have looked like spam...? That's a moot argument, since we know that it did in fact look like spam to at least one person. Again, we're all only human, and we tend to read things very quickly (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
