To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2662
2661  |  2663
Subject: 
Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:09:02 GMT
Reply-To: 
{cjc@}ihatespam{newsguy.com}
Viewed: 
1146 times
  
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
Easy, Easy.  The poor guy was flamed enough yesterday and the day before;
let's let it drop.  I think Keith gets the idea.

That's what I get for having my phone service go out for a day and
missing a couple of days of work.  Everyone else makes a topic moot
before I get to it.  :)

It was a simple mistake.  Careless maybe, but, well, we're all only human.

You're probably right.

Obviously it might've looked like spam to some people.

Nope, Tom's opinion about usenet spam aside, I don't really think it
could have, especially if one actually looks at the site.

The virtual flowers service have won me MAJOR brownie points - I like
'em.  Recommended them to friends even.  :)

--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
 
(...) I'm sure I'm not the only person who doesn't look at web sites mentioned in posts which look like spam. If I do, that's just validating the spammers. (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
 
(...) I think you're arguing whether or not it "should" have looked like spam...? That's a moot argument, since we know that it did in fact look like spam to at least one person. Again, we're all only human, and we tend to read things very quickly (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Virtual Flower Delivery Service
 
(...) Easy, Easy. The poor guy was flamed enough yesterday and the day before; let's let it drop. I think Keith gets the idea. It was a simple mistake. Careless maybe, but, well, we're all only human. Obviously it might've looked like spam to some (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

42 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR