To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 5529
5528  |  5530
Subject: 
Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:05:08 GMT
Viewed: 
16643 times
  
In lugnet.dear-lego, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
> Building equality one female minifig at a time. (My apologies in advance for
> those of you that have already heard this rant.)
> 
> Dear Lego,
> 
> I have always been impressed with TLC's ability to provide quality products as
> well as sustaining valuable input towards the educational process (Dacta,
> Mindstorms, etc).  This is not something I expect from every toy company, in
> fact many fail miserably in this department.
> 
> After bringing it up (once again at the most recent brick event) I do understand
> that the company is aware of the overwhelming unbalanced gender biassed when it
> comes to male figs vrs female figs and that you are working towards balancing
> that favouritism.
> 
> While Im not suggesting I will buy less of your product, nor trying to even
> suggest that I know what is best for the company I do feel this is the perfect
> forum to say "I am not convinced you are doing enough."
> 
> Frankly, bringing female figs into a few choice sets, such as some of the new
> (non-emergency type) "town sets" really isn't enough.  Perhaps your market
> research has show that little boys toss the female fig back into the bin, but I
> would think that a few discarded figs, would be a acceptable action to for a
> company that has always prided themselves in excellence.  Females being left out
> of so many themes promotes a very negative message to both genders.
> 
> Just a bit of food for thought.  A better alternative to respecting gender
> equality would be to draw more females into wanting to build, and stopping with
> the mentality that there are building sets that you "deem" for males only. Boys
> already desire your products, but many girls are on the borderline, instead of
> ignoring them and catering to an already existing audience, consider opening the
> market up.  I am convinced that one female fig is not going to stop "Johnny"
> from asking his parental units for set "unnamed" for his birthday, but the lack
> of female figs does keep many young girls from asking for any Lego at all.
> 
> I want to promote the idea of  "Yes Virgina, girls can, do, and will build, and
> many of them do it very well" and  I feel right now, Lego is promoting, "Yeah,
> ok. Girls can build a few sets too."
> 
> At events we host, repetitively I am told by parents of girls that they are
> shocked and discouraged by the lack of female figs, and without a doubt that
> adversely influences the enjoyment of your product with a huge amount of
> potential customers.
> 
> There is plenty of research (1) to prove that "manipulatives" such as building
> blocks builds skills needed for a successful future of math literacy, spatial
> understanding and science education in both males and females.
> 
> I think its time that Lego continues their excellence in educational efforts and
> rises to the challenge of providing a progressive approach to both genders.  It
> takes a good company to be socially aware of the subtle sexual discrimination
> that is going on in current product development, and a smart company to actually
> do something about it.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Janey Red Brick
> Not only a fan, but one of many female adult builders, and a parent, teacher and
> educational advocate.

Well of course you'd say all of that; you're a girl!

Hardy har har.

IMO you're right on the money with pretty much everything you wrote.  I can
think of no real justification for failing to include female minifigs in a much
broader range of sets.  And if TLG is concerned that a one-figure set wouldn't
sell if it "only" had a female minifig, then why not just make it a two-figure
set?  Realistically it should add more than, say, fifty cents to the price, and
it would more or less completely satisfy the concerns of gender-based
under-representation.

One other thing: if it makes you feel any better, female minifigs are grossly
under-represented in all brick-based construction toys available in the US...


Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
 
(...) Or, as I mentioned earlier, just include multiple wigs. It's cheaper, and skirts the gender issue completely. (sorry)(but not really) JOHN (19 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
  Re: Building equality one female minifig at a time.
 
(...) This reminds me of one of LEGO's internal rules in the Model Shop (where many of the cool big displays are created) - Minfigs can never be alone. They're always in pairs or groups. They are *interacting* with each other. This was the rule when (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Building equality one female minifig at a time.
 
Building equality one female minifig at a time. (My apologies in advance for those of you that have already heard this rant.) Dear Lego, I have always been impressed with TLC's ability to provide quality products as well as sustaining valuable input (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego) !! 

43 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR