 | | Lugnet has a problem —Anthony Sava
|
| | | Lugnet has a problem. No one can have their own opinion if it differs from everyone elses. If they do, they are attacked. Read the posts that were in reply to my own, stating my discontent with the re-release of the Castle set the Guarded Inn. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | | (...) Well said Anthony, to each his/her own! -Harvey (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | Anthony (et al.), I followed these posts-ALL OF THEM-and there was some really good talk on all three sides of the fence (if you count those sittin' on the pickets-ouch!). From a fresh perspective, I would like to say that no one in the thread typed (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | | Sage advice, Matt! Thanks for putting things in the proper perspective. As far as these old sets being released, I don't give a flying f*** as long as there's one Classic Space set released ;^) So, I didn't post a reply to Brad Justus's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) That's fine. (of course some of us realise that "every theme is spare parts for " X (where X is our theme) ) But I think Hop Frog is on to something when he says that one shouldn't leave readers with the opinion that one is unhappy or jealous (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Anthony, do PLEASE get a thicker skin! Everybody is thinking that TLC could have picked something else, something better. That's why there are all these posts about what sets should come next -- those are the very sets that a lot of people (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Eli Donati
|
| | | | | Anthony ,Anthony, Just wait one second it's understandable that you feel like this but I think that sometimes alot of us here do, can and would spent all our time with lego and if we had the time some of us would start a resistance group(Black (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) I honestly thought it was the other way around! During the last months, everything done by the LEGO Company has been bashed on LUGNET. The Guarded Inn and the Sopwith Camel are probably the exceptions. Should someone take the other view and (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —James Aldrich
|
| | | | | (...) Could this be the same Anthony Sava who referred to the people he assumed would disagree with him as "hypocritic castle heads?" A whiner as well as a complainer. Be sure to bring a good supply of rocks as you retreat to your glass house. And, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Dave Lovelace
|
| | | | | | (...) Pthrrrp. What a crappy, cold reply. Makes me want to quit Lugnet, too. Beat feet, JSA, Lugnet is supposed to be a haven from bullies. --Dave (jot and jab) xxx...xxx (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Jon Furman
|
| | | | | Anthony, I 'm posting because I was the person that possibly branded you a complainer. I'd like you to read this whole post objectively, so I'd like to offer my apology in advance, hoping that you'll see a few things differently, and continue to be (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | | (...) I must also offer my own apologies to everyone at Lugnet. Though I do not plan to continue to post regularly, it was wrong of me to say that everyone here attributes to Lugnet's problem. However, that does not remove the fact that Lugnet still (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) Then grow up and deal with it, you're wrong. Do you actually believe that people MUST read all of your (or anyone's) posts, and comment on them, rather than "ignoring" them, or "looking over" them? GROW UP, the world owes you NOTHING, you (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | | | "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3B22650A.FB6ABA...faq.com... (...) and crying (...) attention! So why you giving it to him? regards lawrence (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | To hopefully forestall the next person whining about noone paying attention to them. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | | You know, I've tried to stay out of this, though I do have to say. Tom I would have thought better coming from you. Anthony wasn't 'whining' about being ignored, he was simply stating a fact that is very prevalent on this server. People get ignored. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's great advice. (...) Flaming cruxifixion? Seems a mixed metaphor... :-) Seriously, we've had some discussions about the phenomenon in the past. Lots of them. Is LUGNET cliqueish? It must be, I would think, unless it is unlike every other (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | (...) Mookie, who has ever stabbed YOU in the back? I can't even fathom this happening...I presume you mean creatively, etc. And I DO recall your comments about castle walls -- but then again, haven't you been using MOC stickers on walls? I am going (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GEqDFD.FIt@lugnet.com... (...) You moving? -Tim (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Mookie wrote: <snip> (...) Hi Tamyra, Actually I wouldn't have replied as the Tom's way, but my thoughts are pretty same about this kind of "cry baby attitude". Actually you already revealed the trick: "having a thicker skin". And not having great (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: <snip> I assume (...) No you're not! ;-) And Tammy, by the looks of it, you didn't kill this thread either. Now it's my turn. /\/\ark - watching the 3724 watching him - de Kock (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | | (...) I'm not certain why you set the FUT to .off-topic.debate, because it is certainly on-topic for LUGNET. Anyhow, in keeping with my vow to stay out of this group, this is going to be a fire-and-forget message :] My advice is to just not worry (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —John Carroll
|
| | | | | (...) Anthony Please Don't leave Lugnet or stop posting. I have been in your shoes before. When I suggested that some people would not be especially happy if the July surprise was the reissue of the early 80's sets. (specifically the guarded Inn but (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | I'm sorry you feel this way, Anthony. I read through the posts and I think, by and large, that most of the replies were pretty cordial, but there were a couple that went a bit overboard on attacking you personally instead of debating your point. I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Michael Reynolds
|
| | | | | (...) Welcome to the real world (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | (...) Uh...hi folks. I took a break from lugnet for a bit around april. I still uh..."lurked"...I think thats what you internet folks call it. Any way, I took a break cause I was taking some things a bit seriously. I'm full of hypocrycies, I think (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | | (...) Dang, that's pretty messed up, man! Well, I love ya! ;^) And it's good to see you back. Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | | (...) hold on now, just a dang minute! don't go getting all touchy feely and trying to hug me and all that or I might just have to bust a cap up in here! (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | | (...) Aiyeet, dawg! Word to yo mutha, G! ;^) Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | | (...) "Grrr...rrr...!" (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Ka-On Lee
|
| | | | | (...) First this statment is totally wrong. You can have your own opinion even when everyone disagree. Now do you notice this is a FAN group? We are not a group of professional news reporter or something like that. It's like going to a Star Trek (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Josh Baakko
|
| | | | | | (...) If they can't diagree, then how can they have their own opinion? You may have you own opinion, but hey do to even if it dosn't agree with yours. (...) Oh, and Any Old set being re-released is good, I'm not particliarly into castle, but I've (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony) —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | Removed debate from the line up... (I was getting bored with it anyway ;) ) I said what I needed to say, Now they can either play nice or stay outta .castle :) Don't worry Richard, you aren't on of them... no one in the .castle area is, so you can (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony) —Mike Timm
|
| | | | | | | Cannot let Tamy get last post in thread :^P (...) Perhaps our aggressions mostly go into the creations so they are more seldom in our post? (aka we vent more?) (...) Tamy I also love your pages. (...) Mike (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think it's because *your* theme actually has weapons and can vent aggression, e.g., flinging bricks with working catapults. Over in .pirates, over half our cannon can't even shoot! It's pathetic. At least we have lots of parrots and monkeys. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | <snip here, snip there, snip every-everywhere> (...) Yeah, I think we are one of the nicest groups around. I feel so much at home in .castle. Even we have our bad times though, that's allowed, and hey, it happens - to everyone. (After seeing two (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | Yo Anthony, I have'nt read this whole thread, but i don't want to see you leave! Suffice to say there are alot of Smarties out there who like to put their two cents in...it's tough to deal with......but for the rest of us....don't go! Eric (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read —Jimmy Park
|
| | | | | (...) I really, really wanted to let this die, but I realized that someday you will be back and that something like this could likely happen again. With that in mind I'd like to say the following: Although a lot of the issues have now been clouded (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | (...) There is an old saying, "You can't please all of the people, all of the time." Guess what Anthony? You proved it to be true. But understand, LEGO is about to release a few new castle sets via Harry Potter and they have to be careful not to (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well... I dunno if "attacked" is the right word here-- surely if you offer up an opinion that others don't share, they're likely to respond. It's human nature, not Lugnet. Of course attacking does happen, but usually, people set a tone. If I (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
