 | | Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Lugnet has a problem. No one can have their own opinion if it differs from everyone elses. If they do, they are attacked. Read the posts that were in reply to my own, stating my discontent with the re-release of the Castle set the Guarded Inn. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Well said Anthony, to each his/her own! -Harvey (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Anthony (et al.), I followed these posts-ALL OF THEM-and there was some really good talk on all three sides of the fence (if you count those sittin' on the pickets-ouch!). From a fresh perspective, I would like to say that no one in the thread typed (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Anthony, do PLEASE get a thicker skin! Everybody is thinking that TLC could have picked something else, something better. That's why there are all these posts about what sets should come next -- those are the very sets that a lot of people (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Anthony ,Anthony, Just wait one second it's understandable that you feel like this but I think that sometimes alot of us here do, can and would spent all our time with lego and if we had the time some of us would start a resistance group(Black (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) I honestly thought it was the other way around! During the last months, everything done by the LEGO Company has been bashed on LUGNET. The Guarded Inn and the Sopwith Camel are probably the exceptions. Should someone take the other view and (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Could this be the same Anthony Sava who referred to the people he assumed would disagree with him as "hypocritic castle heads?" A whiner as well as a complainer. Be sure to bring a good supply of rocks as you retreat to your glass house. And, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
Anthony, I 'm posting because I was the person that possibly branded you a complainer. I'd like you to read this whole post objectively, so I'd like to offer my apology in advance, hoping that you'll see a few things differently, and continue to be (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) I'm not certain why you set the FUT to .off-topic.debate, because it is certainly on-topic for LUGNET. Anyhow, in keeping with my vow to stay out of this group, this is going to be a fire-and-forget message :] My advice is to just not worry (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Anthony Please Don't leave Lugnet or stop posting. I have been in your shoes before. When I suggested that some people would not be especially happy if the July surprise was the reissue of the early 80's sets. (specifically the guarded Inn but (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
I'm sorry you feel this way, Anthony. I read through the posts and I think, by and large, that most of the replies were pretty cordial, but there were a couple that went a bit overboard on attacking you personally instead of debating your point. I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) I must also offer my own apologies to everyone at Lugnet. Though I do not plan to continue to post regularly, it was wrong of me to say that everyone here attributes to Lugnet's problem. However, that does not remove the fact that Lugnet still (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Sage advice, Matt! Thanks for putting things in the proper perspective. As far as these old sets being released, I don't give a flying f*** as long as there's one Classic Space set released ;^) So, I didn't post a reply to Brad Justus's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) That's fine. (of course some of us realise that "every theme is spare parts for " X (where X is our theme) ) But I think Hop Frog is on to something when he says that one shouldn't leave readers with the opinion that one is unhappy or jealous (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) Then grow up and deal with it, you're wrong. Do you actually believe that people MUST read all of your (or anyone's) posts, and comment on them, rather than "ignoring" them, or "looking over" them? GROW UP, the world owes you NOTHING, you (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3B22650A.FB6ABA...faq.com... (...) and crying (...) attention! So why you giving it to him? regards lawrence (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Welcome to the real world (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
To hopefully forestall the next person whining about noone paying attention to them. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Uh...hi folks. I took a break from lugnet for a bit around april. I still uh..."lurked"...I think thats what you internet folks call it. Any way, I took a break cause I was taking some things a bit seriously. I'm full of hypocrycies, I think (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Dang, that's pretty messed up, man! Well, I love ya! ;^) And it's good to see you back. Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) First this statment is totally wrong. You can have your own opinion even when everyone disagree. Now do you notice this is a FAN group? We are not a group of professional news reporter or something like that. It's like going to a Star Trek (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) hold on now, just a dang minute! don't go getting all touchy feely and trying to hug me and all that or I might just have to bust a cap up in here! (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) If they can't diagree, then how can they have their own opinion? You may have you own opinion, but hey do to even if it dosn't agree with yours. (...) Oh, and Any Old set being re-released is good, I'm not particliarly into castle, but I've (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
You know, I've tried to stay out of this, though I do have to say. Tom I would have thought better coming from you. Anthony wasn't 'whining' about being ignored, he was simply stating a fact that is very prevalent on this server. People get ignored. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Aiyeet, dawg! Word to yo mutha, G! ;^) Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) That's great advice. (...) Flaming cruxifixion? Seems a mixed metaphor... :-) Seriously, we've had some discussions about the phenomenon in the past. Lots of them. Is LUGNET cliqueish? It must be, I would think, unless it is unlike every other (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) Mookie, who has ever stabbed YOU in the back? I can't even fathom this happening...I presume you mean creatively, etc. And I DO recall your comments about castle walls -- but then again, haven't you been using MOC stickers on walls? I am going (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony)
|
|
Removed debate from the line up... (I was getting bored with it anyway ;) ) I said what I needed to say, Now they can either play nice or stay outta .castle :) Don't worry Richard, you aren't on of them... no one in the .castle area is, so you can (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Yo Anthony, I have'nt read this whole thread, but i don't want to see you leave! Suffice to say there are alot of Smarties out there who like to put their two cents in...it's tough to deal with......but for the rest of us....don't go! Eric (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony)
|
|
Cannot let Tamy get last post in thread :^P (...) Perhaps our aggressions mostly go into the creations so they are more seldom in our post? (aka we vent more?) (...) Tamy I also love your pages. (...) Mike (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony)
|
|
<snip here, snip there, snip every-everywhere> (...) Yeah, I think we are one of the nicest groups around. I feel so much at home in .castle. Even we have our bad times though, that's allowed, and hey, it happens - to everyone. (After seeing two (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GEqDFD.FIt@lugnet.com... (...) You moving? -Tim (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff ;) (Was Re: Sorry Anthony)
|
|
(...) I think it's because *your* theme actually has weapons and can vent aggression, e.g., flinging bricks with working catapults. Over in .pirates, over half our cannon can't even shoot! It's pathetic. At least we have lots of parrots and monkeys. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
Mookie wrote: <snip> (...) Hi Tamyra, Actually I wouldn't have replied as the Tom's way, but my thoughts are pretty same about this kind of "cry baby attitude". Actually you already revealed the trick: "having a thicker skin". And not having great (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) "Grrr...rrr...!" (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Pthrrrp. What a crappy, cold reply. Makes me want to quit Lugnet, too. Beat feet, JSA, Lugnet is supposed to be a haven from bullies. --Dave (jot and jab) xxx...xxx (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) I really, really wanted to let this die, but I realized that someday you will be back and that something like this could likely happen again. With that in mind I'd like to say the following: Although a lot of the issues have now been clouded (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) There is an old saying, "You can't please all of the people, all of the time." Guess what Anthony? You proved it to be true. But understand, LEGO is about to release a few new castle sets via Harry Potter and they have to be careful not to (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Well... I dunno if "attacked" is the right word here-- surely if you offer up an opinion that others don't share, they're likely to respond. It's human nature, not Lugnet. Of course attacking does happen, but usually, people set a tone. If I (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: <snip> I assume (...) No you're not! ;-) And Tammy, by the looks of it, you didn't kill this thread either. Now it's my turn. /\/\ark - watching the 3724 watching him - de Kock (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
