Subject:
|
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:15:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lordinsanity@/NoMoreSpam/usa.net
|
Viewed:
|
191 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
>
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > > > > Castle is back, and it's not very nice. I was hoping for another year
> > > > > of Ninja, but I'm afraid it's back to "Knight's Kingdom". A few new
>
> This is what I responded to. It appears that this person refers
> Ninja to more traditional Castle subthemes.
>
> I still maintain the Ninja subtheme sucks. I don't see how anyone
> could prefer it to real Castle stuff.
I will take 50 shoguns over 50 kings anyday. Heck even 50 batlords are
better than 50 of those stupid kings. The new 6026 would have been the
set i likely would have wanted 50 of. Not with that @#$%&* king
though. Also why dose 6095 have ANOTHER king instead of the
princess/queen. If it wasn't for the 3 kings and only one princess I
would say this new incarnation of castle is better. Unless a polybag
set with a "saucer helmet" knight is relased I will have no choice but
to think Ninja and even fright knights is better.
(Classic lions could be the queens gaurd, royal knights could be the
king's gaurd, this new theme I could finnally afford a sizable army for
the standard military. THREE KINGS. @#$%^&*@#$%^&*@#$$%^^&* DOH!!
[snip]
Come on polybag!!!
--
-Lord Insanity
"A little nonsense now and then, relished by the wisest men"
Visit me at: http://members.tripod.com/~LordInsanity
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
