To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 9804
9803  |  9805
Subject: 
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
Followup-To: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 23:12:25 GMT
Viewed: 
1043 times
  
In lugnet.general, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
[...]
I'd agree with anyone who felt that FK, DF, and RK were pale
imitations of the glory years.  Still, I'd prefer pale imitations to
TLG's tardy attempt to cash in on the Ninja-craze that swept through
the waking world 10 years ago or more.

Well, see, that's your opinion, and that's fine.  But when other opinions
differ, that doesn't make someone a doofus, right?

Whenever I find myself going "oh gawd" about anyone who's excited by UFO,
Exploriens, or Insectoids, I remind myself that (a) everyone is entitled to
their own opinion and (b) many people in their teens and twenties never
-had- the older, truly great sets to compare with.  The newer sets are also
more geared toward younger rather than older people.  Oh dear, I'm on a rant
again.

--Todd

[followups to lugnet.castle]



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
(...) Ok, so you see I wasn't necessarily (or at all, in fact) responding to the alleged "skimpiness" of the new sets. Cool. Give me basic gray bricks, castle walls, and pitchforks and I'll be happy. I'd agree with anyone who felt that FK, DF, and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

49 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR