To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 10095
10094  |  10096
Subject: 
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:09:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1149 times
  
In lugnet.general, Mike Petrucelli writes:
I will take 50 shoguns over 50 kings anyday.  Heck even 50 batlords are
better than 50 of those stupid kings.  The new 6026 would have been the
set i likely would have wanted 50 of.  Not with that @#$%&* king
though.  Also why dose 6095 have ANOTHER king instead of the
princess/queen.  If it wasn't for the 3 kings and only one princess I
would say this new incarnation of castle is better.  Unless a polybag
set with a "saucer helmet" knight is relased I will have no choice but
to think Ninja and even fright knights is better.

(Classic lions could be the queens gaurd, royal knights could be the
king's gaurd, this new theme I could finnally afford a sizable army for
the standard military.  THREE KINGS.  @#$%^&*@#$%^&*@#$$%^^&*  DOH!!

I WOULDN'T mind the three kings, but there aren't enough of the regular
soldiers at ALL! By my count of "Royal Knights 2" figs:
6026 - 1 soldier + 1 king
6091 - 3 soldiers + 1 king + 1 princess (+2 moo men & 1 skeleton)
6094 - 1 soldier (+1 moo man)
6095 - 1 soldier + 1 king (+1 moo man)
Wagon?(p16) - 1 soldier?
Grand total: 6(7?) soldiers + 3 kings + 1 princess = 10 or 11 figs!?!?

Sigh, it's gonna cost SO much money to build up a good army. Hence my army
will probably stay small :(  Even if I bought 2 of every set I wouldn't have
enough to have a good army (14 soldiers? Come on!) PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
PLEASE HAVE A POLYBAG OR MINIFIG PACK! "Help me Polybag! You're my only hope!"

What ever happened to the good old days? When castles came with 12 figs? I mean
that's more figs in 1 set than you'd get from this whole theme!

DaveE



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
(...) <sigh> Oh how I wish. At least we can make a decent barbarian horde. (Polybag, polybag, come on polybag.) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
This part of the art of Lego. Adding to a theme to increase the size of the army. I took the newest and last armada soliders (green and red) and added them to the Woodsmen and old Lion Armies. They became officers or minor nobles whatever you wish (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
(...) I will take 50 shoguns over 50 kings anyday. Heck even 50 batlords are better than 50 of those stupid kings. The new 6026 would have been the set i likely would have wanted 50 of. Not with that @#$%&* king though. Also why dose 6095 have (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

49 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR