General Discussion : 9799


General / 9799	9798 \| 9800

Subject:	Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
Date:	Mon, 8 Nov 1999 22:56:52 GMT
Viewed:	1002 times

In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes: > > OK, he also wrote that he was hoping for another year of Ninja, but maybe > that was because he either liked Ninja (which I would argue is "OK" :-) or > because he felt that recent themes like Fright Knights, Dark Forest, and > Royal Knights had only been pale imitations of the glory years anyway. > > --Todd what was wrong with Royal Knights? KL

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
(...) Not alot, really. It was the current theme when I came out of my Dark Ages, and I think it's the best of the last 4 subthemes. That doesn't mean it was as good as some of the earlier subthemes, but it was good. (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

		Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
(...) I didn't say there was anything wrong with it. I didn't even say that it was a pale imitation of glory-year sets. I said Thad -might- have felt that it was. Just speculation. Me, I'm a Space head, and I hate all Castle stuff anyway, except for (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
(...) OK, he also wrote that he was hoping for another year of Ninja, but maybe that was because he either liked Ninja (which I would argue is "OK" :-) or because he felt that recent themes like Fright Knights, Dark Forest, and Royal Knights had (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)

49 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search