Subject:
|
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 22:47:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
944 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> In lugnet.general, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> > Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> > > "Thad A. Doria" <tad@journals.uchicago.edu> writes:
> > > > Castle is back, and it's not very nice. I was hoping for another year
> > > > of Ninja, but I'm afraid it's back to "Knight's Kingdom". A few new
> > > > castle wall pieces, the Princess is back, new catapults, and a tan
> > > > pedestal-like piece that's interesting, but the sets themselves look
> > > > very skimpy, esp. when compared to Ninja sets. Oh, the CyberSlam missile
> > > > launchers get recycled in black.
> >
> > Glad I don't waste my time with RTL anymore. What kind of doofus
> > would prefer Ninja to REAL Castle stuff? Gimme a break.
>
> First of all, Thad only wrote that the new sets looked "very skimpy"
> compared to the Ninja sets... [...]
OK, he also wrote that he was hoping for another year of Ninja, but maybe
that was because he either liked Ninja (which I would argue is "OK" :-) or
because he felt that recent themes like Fright Knights, Dark Forest, and
Royal Knights had only been pale imitations of the glory years anyway.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
