Subject:
|
Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 23:18:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
599 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> > I found this in RTL:
> >
> > "Thad A. Doria" <tad@journals.uchicago.edu> writes:
> >
> > > Got one (in a Snowspeeder box) yesterday. Quick impressions:
> > >
> > > Castle is back, and it's not very nice. I was hoping for another year
> > > of Ninja, but I'm afraid it's back to "Knight's Kingdom". A few new
> > > castle wall pieces, the Princess is back, new catapults, and a tan
> > > pedestal-like piece that's interesting, but the sets themselves look
> > > very skimpy, esp. when compared to Ninja sets. Oh, the CyberSlam missile
> > > launchers get recycled in black.
>
> Glad I don't waste my time with RTL anymore. What kind of doofus
> would prefer Ninja to REAL Castle stuff? Gimme a break.
Someone who is a fan of Akira Kurosawa's films might well enjoy the Ninja
theme. Lego's target audience (i.e. kids) might. I wouldn't think either
could inherently refered to as a "doofus". Why is Fright Knights "real" castle
and Ninja not?
Personally, I think the Ninja series was an interesting sub-theme. I also
understand it doesn't fit in as well with the preceeding european-based
castles. I enjoyed Ninja, but feel that it has run its course and I am looking
forward to the new euro-castle (alleged) line.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
| (...) Fright Knights sucked too. Just less than Ninja. (...) I didn't like it at all. Doubt I'll hold onto any of the Ninja minifigs in the remaining sets I have. (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
