To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.rayOpen lugnet.cad.ray in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Ray-Tracing / 1513
1512  |  1514
Subject: 
Re: Excellent rendering...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.ray
Date: 
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:05:53 GMT
Viewed: 
3516 times
  
Wow... now that's what I'd like to see in my animations. But the render
times are just impossible. A 15 second clip would take a month rendering! I
guess I'll stay with the standard methods and stop-motion for a while.

On another note, returning to this image:
http://tubafrog.com/temp/morefigs.jpg
While I agree that they look just like real figs, the dimensions are somehow
slightly off. There's something about them that doesn't quite work. But
that's probably just me.

Stefan.

---
New film by YellowHead Studios:
Animation Class Lesson 1.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/wandrer/animationclass/animclass.avi
Right-click and Save target As...


"Anders Isaksson" <isaksson.etuna@REMOVEebox.tninet.se> schreef in bericht
news:H2uvr1.Fxx@lugnet.com...
> "Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com...
> > 
> > http://www.pobursky.com/images/7181old.png (Warning to modem users, • 259K)
> > 
> > One thing though, the colors seem to be "washed out".  Is there anyway • to
> > fix this?
> 
> - Make sure you don't have any lights on (you've probably already done • this)
> - Play with the 'assumed_gamma' value (higher value, darker picture)
> - Lower the AMB value (if it's still greater than zero)
> - Lower the DIF value
> 
> You could probably play with the 'color map' in the sky sphere too.
> 
> There are probably some things that can be changed in the radiosity
> parameters, but who has the time to experiment with these?
> 
> I also played with changing the reflection values in the non-transparent
> color definitions. I changed the 'reflection 0.08' to 'reflection RFL' and
> experimented with different (lower) values. Decided 0.04 was more like my
> Lego bricks.
> 
> Lars Hassing, if you're reading this, can the next L3P output
> 
> #declare RFL = 0.08;
> #declare TRANS_RFL = 0.2;
> 
> and use these constants in the color definitions instead of having numeric
> constants in every color definition? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I only
> found those two different values.
> 
> --
> Anders Isaksson, Sweden
> BlockCAD:  http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
> Gallery:   http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
> 
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Excellent rendering...
 
"Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com... (...) - Make sure you don't have any lights on (you've probably already done this) - Play with the 'assumed_gamma' value (higher value, darker (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)

59 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR