Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:47:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
493 times
|
| |
| |
I just meant to say that Acrobat Reader isn't so speedy. Microsoft handles
HTML files, natively, so it's a little bit quicker on the fly than Acrobat.
Maybe there's some LINUX or Mac analogue? Then, you wouldn't have to format
for three different applications. After all, if it's formatted to Microsoft
Help (or some other program that functions like it) it will automatically
work on the web by Tim Courtney's very own standards.
Tim Courtney:
> The neat thing about the way the LDraw.org HTML pages are constructed is - the
> body text is its own include file. So you get a file for the body with just
> paragraph, link, and image tags versus any formatting. Some pages have single
> tables around the includes, but I will be changing that as I modify pages so
> evnetually all pages on the server's bodies will be a separate minimal HTML
> include file.
I'm sorry if I've "flamed" you in any way. I didn't really mean any offense.
-Mike
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Matthew Gerber writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Michael Horvath writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Michael Horvath writes:
> > > Properly created PDF files are compact, quick and infinately
> > > cross-platform...perfectly formatted and ready to print via the greatest
> > > built-in software print rasterizer known to computing.
> >
> > Th interface is lowsy, the browser slows down my system.
>
> Well sure, what plug-in doesn't? You're splitting the resources of the
> processor to deliver content within a framework already delivering content,
> all while connected to the Internet! (And the interface just requires
> learning...it's fairly basic, really)
>
> Instead of relying on the browser plug-in, especially on an older system,
> download the file and keep it locally, then view it in the actual Reader
> utility...you'll be much happier. (Of course, you'll note that it takes the
> same amount of time to download the file whether you are using the plug-in
> or not, it'll just SEEM faster in the long run!) Besides, we're talking
> delivery of content that you would use off-line anyway, right? It's not like
> you'd want to be running your LDraw tools and have a live connection to the
> Internet...you'd want those files local for zippy access.
>
> Matt
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
39 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|