Subject:
|
Re: Official model repository situation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:54:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
918 times
|
| |
|
|
And here's another issue. The Brickshelf has self-imposed restrictions to
not have scans of instructions for sets from 1997 or later. Should the OMR
have a similar restriction?
--Ryan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| Ryan: (...) The whole idea of the OMR is very much in a grey area copyright-wise, so I suggest that those in charge of the OMR contact LEGO, explain the situation, and ask them what they find is reasonable. Jacob PS: You could also ask your own (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| (...) Why not use the same naming convention as the LUGNET DB ? That way we can cross-reference easily, there could be an option to download the .dat file just like there is now a "download building instructions from brickshelf". Well, assuming Todd (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
