Subject:
|
Re: Official model repository situation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:35:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
668 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Ryan Farrington writes:
> Ryan Dennett wrote:
> > You, know, it's funny that you asked this, Ryan, because I meant to talk • to
> > Tim about it last night, but totally forgot. On the way home I was • thinking
> > about LDraw stuff when I remembered the OMR. I was getting ready to write • a
> > message to Tim, when I saw these posts, so I guess I'll just combine it • into
> > this. The OMR is something that I had really hoped would be functioning, • at
> > least in a small way, by now. Ryan, were you asking because of interest in
> > helping with it? If so in what way?
>
> Well, I was going to model most/all of my sets for the Repository...and I
> have some ideas for the directory structure...
>
> Tim Courtney wrote:
> > Page generation, searchability, and indexing are issues. By theme?
> > Set number? Name? Or all of the above (and how)?
>
> I would say regarding organizing them for indexing, by theme then group
> (sub-theme) then set name would be the most efficient method (especially for
> people looking for a specific set). And if it makes sense to do so, we
> could have a sub-domain for all the official sets: models.ldraw.org. So you
> go to the OMR at http://www.ldraw.org/repository/official/ and you can
> choose your theme, which would link to something like
> http://models.ldraw.org/castle/. Then you could choose the sub-theme,
> http://models.ldraw.org/castle/forestmen/, where there would be thumbnails
> (either LDrawn or POV-Rayed) of all the Forestmen sets.
>
> Thoughts? (and I understand the not-so-urgent status of this, so...no need
> to rush replies, I think)
> --Ryan
Hi CAD gang,
Just poking my nose in from the inventory group next door. ML-CAD can generate
a parts list from any DAT file, so the Repository could perhaps be a great
source for inventories. Could I suggest that anyone making official models,
include comments about parts that are changed or left out because the proper
parts aren't created yet, or other differences like printing? There are a lot
of sets not yet inventoried - Space is very bare indeed - and if people are
making accurate models, then an inventory wouldn't need to be done separately.
Probably links could be set up to include the Repository in the collection of
linked databases existing in and around LUGNET, as well. What do you think?
Cheers, Heather
--
Heather Patey
St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Pirate Wench / Brick Detective
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| This is just a quick message to let you know that either later today or tomorrow I will be posting the information for the OMR, ie the headers, what to do about missing pieces, etc. I just need to type it up and have Tim edit to make sure everything (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| "Heather Patey" <hpatey@nfld.com> wrote in message news:G8t1yJ.1HG@lugnet.com... (...) generate (...) Hi Heather - Good idea! Yes, MLCad can put out an inventory (and I think LeoCAD can too). So, instead of looking up a set to inventory it, make a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| (...) to (...) thinking (...) a (...) into (...) at (...) Well, I was going to model most/all of my sets for the Repository...and I have some ideas for the directory structure... Tim Courtney wrote: (...) I would say regarding organizing them for (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
