Subject:
|
Re: Official model repository situation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:43:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
700 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> Here are my thoughts. Given the standard header/hard drive storage system • as
> posted at:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=251
>
> I say we index them by set number only. This will be the easiest, IMO. A
> person can search for the set by theme/name on LUGNET
> (http://guide.lugnet.com/set/) and then key in the set number on LDraw.org • to
> download the DAT. I feel that way because they're to be stored on a hard • drive
> in a directory with the set number...so why not index them that way? No • where
> in the file naming system does it acknowledge the set name. LUGNET can • link
> directly to the DAT file on LDraw.org so it can be downloaded too (much • similar
> to how it points to Brickshelf instructions).
>
> Brickshelf splits the index into numbers, last time I saw. Eg.
>
> /6000/6XXX/
>
> So, 6195 Neptune Discovery Lab would be at
>
> http://www.ldraw.org/repository/official/6000/6195.mpd
> (no need for a redundant directory when the MPD name is the number)
>
> or
>
> http://models.ldraw.org/sets/6000/6195.mpd
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Tim
Okay. Yeah, I forgot about the naming system in the annoucement.
Cheers,
--Ryan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Official model repository situation
|
| "Ryan Farrington" <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:001401c0975c$38...dly.com... (...) Umm... Here are my thoughts. Given the standard header/hard drive storage system as posted at: (URL) say we index them by set number only. This will be (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
