Subject:
|
Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:01:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
890 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Peter A. Vogel wrote:
> Here's an idea, to go along with the concept of a "parts palette" implied by
> Ralph and mentioned explicitly by Steve: Make a standard keyword indicating
> the sets that the part appears in. Allow a palette to be populated
> automatically by set #. Doesn't necessarily solve the "how many of these
> are in a set" but that is less important than just not accidentally using a
> part the set does not have...
Probably would be better to have 'palette files' that you can load into the
parts palette. If we coded the set information into each part file, we'd
have to update large portions of the part-library every few months, as new
sets were released.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts
|
| (...) WOW! I didnt realize that I had started such a discussion. I think that the parts palettes are a great idea. That might be something for those working on the artemis project to take a look at. My annoyance from wading through endless seas of (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts
|
| "Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote in message news:000101c027c2$7f...@pro150... (...) each (...) Gathering (...) the (...) making (...) move on (...) You (...) layout (...) parts (...) For example: (...) parts (...) one (...) YES! As I was (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
