Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:56:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7592 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
| |
| |
| |
| |
For example, here is an image from the part tracker:
|
|
|
Last night, I updated the rendering script to use L3Lab’s “Front-Upper-Right”
view for most parts (Baseplates use a top-down view, panels use
“Back-Upper-Left”). The actual parameter/array is:
0.7071,0,0.7071,0.3536,0.866,-0.3536,-0.6124,0.5,0.6124
I also changed the scale from .85 to 1.0, which seems to fit the new images
to about the same size as old images.
Do the unofficial images look better now?
|
Looks better to me too. What’s the rest of the command line look like?
I wonder if maybe we can tweak it one more time to convince the edge lines
to meet at the corners.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) It looks about like this: ldglite -a<matrix> -ld -Q -b15 -i1 -MS<outfile>.png <infile>.dat Lugnet is insisting on eating the matrix text (I seem to remember this happening before, sometime). So the matrix looks something like: 0.7071, 0, (...) (17 years ago, 10-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) Last night, I updated the rendering script to use L3Lab's "Front-Upper-Right" view for most parts (Baseplates use a top-down view, panels use "Back-Upper-Left"). The actual parameter/array is: 0.7071,0,0.7071,0.35...0.5,0.6124 I also changed (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
