Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:06:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6893 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> After messing around, I (manually) got the image for 58119.dat straightened out
> <http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/58119.dat>
>
> But I haven't convinced the script that it should run this way. Yet.
OK, that wasn't so hard. The script should be fixed now. I've pushed through
re-renders for 58119 and x919. All other parts are queued for re-rendering, all
images should be updated in a short time.
If anyone wants to look at the ldliterc.dat file, you can grab a copy at
http://www.ldraw.org/library/unofficial/ldliterc.dat
Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) looked at the ldliterc.dat above, and color 7 has the same setting as what is in ldconfig.ldr. However, the actual color being rendered seems too light. For example, here is an image from the part tracker: (URL) Here is the same part rendered (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) Oooo! Thanks for mentioning this. I had forgotten about it, as if I never knew it. After messing around, I (manually) got the image for 58119.dat straightened out (URL) But I haven't convinced the script that it should run this way. Yet. If (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
