Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:31:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6008 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> > That's unfortunate (but what I thought I remembered). I didn't have a lot of
> > luck updating the ldliterc.dat file used by the PT. Even after regenerating all
> > the unofficial part images, 58119's image is still incorrect.
> >
> > I'll have to mess with it some more, hopefully I'll have time this evening.
>
> Any news about this? I have submitted a new part with the same color scheme
> (http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/58121.dat), problem remains
> :-(
Nope, sorry. No update. As far as I can tell, ldglite[1] won't recognize
colors like 71 and 72.
--
Steve
1) At least, the ldglite binary on the server.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) than we should start thinking about the switch to LDView as render engine ... if this is technically doable. to be frank I didn't understand a single word from all the tech speech above: x server or not, OSMesa a mess ... Travis, I guess you (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) While I agree with Willy's assessment that it may be time to move on to ldview for the part tracker, I did run a quick test and it looks like ldglite does support modified colors like 71 or 72 with the ldliterc.dat file. Perhaps the location (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
