Computer Aided Design : 14841


CAD / 14841	14840 \| 14842

Subject:	Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:22:13 GMT
Viewed:	7323 times

Travis Cobbs wrote: > For example, here is an image from the part tracker: > > <<http://www.ldraw.org/library/unofficial/images/parts/52107.png>> To my eyes, the proportions of that picture are completely off, that part should have the proportions of a normal 1x2[x1], right? Not 1x2x0.72 or whatever that picture shows... -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm Gallery: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
(...) I think it's using an isometric matrix for the view, which leads to this effect. This matches the default output from ldraw.exe. Here is 3004.dat rendered with ldraw.exe and then scaled down to match the size of the image on the part tracker: (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
(...) looked at the ldliterc.dat above, and color 7 has the same setting as what is in ldconfig.ldr. However, the actual color being rendered seems too light. For example, here is an image from the part tracker: (URL) Here is the same part rendered (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

43 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search