Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:28:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7469 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I could probably whip up a program that does the conversion fairly
> quickly (hour or two of work?) if you're interested. I have the
> advantage that I already have a full parser for ldconfig.ldr.
> Spitting out the ldliterc.dat file should be straightforward.
Yes, but wouldn't that be subverting Willy's diabolical plan to render
everything with ldview? ;^)
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) Well, to be perfectly honest, while I'm pretty confident that LDView can be gotten to work relatively easily (via xvfb) on the LDraw server, I'm not sure whether its performance will be "acceptable". So I think it's only fair to keep the (...) (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) I could probably whip up a program that does the conversion fairly quickly (hour or two of work?) if you're interested. I have the advantage that I already have a full parser for ldconfig.ldr. Spitting out the ldliterc.dat file should be (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
