Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:49:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5316 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > > > consider also a switch to LDView as rendering engine; it does a fine job for
> > > > the MOTM
> > >
> > > I missed that one. We've got ldview installed on the server?
> >
> > If you don't (and I suspect that you don't), I'd be happy to help you compile it
> > there (assuming the binaries don't work), but there's a significant catch. Even
> > when rendering snapshots from the command line, it currently still requires a
> > connection to an X server's display. That's kind of a problem for background
> > tasks.
> >
> > An OSMesa version could probably be made as Don suggests, but I don't know at
> > this point what the level of difficulty would be in doing that. It could
> > potentially be quite high.
>
> That's unfortunate (but what I thought I remembered). I didn't have a lot of
> luck updating the ldliterc.dat file used by the PT. Even after regenerating all
> the unofficial part images, 58119's image is still incorrect.
>
> I'll have to mess with it some more, hopefully I'll have time this evening.
>
> Steve
steve,
any updates on this? BTW, did you get my request to use LDAO in the
All-In-One-Installer or has it been eaten up by your spam-monster?
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) That's unfortunate (but what I thought I remembered). I didn't have a lot of luck updating the ldliterc.dat file used by the PT. Even after regenerating all the unofficial part images, 58119's image is still incorrect. I'll have to mess with (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
