Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:47:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4177 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
| |
Case in point, http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/58119.dat
where Medium Stone and Dark Stone appear the same...
|
That’s a good question. The Parts Tracker probably doesn’t use ldconfig.ldr,
because the image-generator uses a custom script to maintain a combined
library of official & unofficial files, which predates ldconfig.ldr.
I’m also not sure the version of ldglite we’ve installed is recent enough to
support ldconfig.ldr.
I’ll look into the issue.
Steve
|
consider also a switch to LDView as rendering engine; it does a fine job for
the MOTM:
w.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) Yeah, it might be time to make the switch. Ldglite has never been updated to use ldconfig.ldr (although it probably wouldn't difficult). It currently only supports the older ldlite config file ldliterc.dat with ldlite COLOR metacommands to (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) That's a good question. The Parts Tracker probably doesn't use ldconfig.ldr, because the image-generator uses a custom script to maintain a combined library of official & unofficial files, which predates ldconfig.ldr. I'm also not sure the (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
