Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:32:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6553 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> than we should start thinking about the switch to LDView as render engine ... if
> this is technically doable. to be frank I didn't understand a single word from
> all the tech speech above: x server or not, OSMesa a mess ... Travis, I guess
> you need server access to answer my questions?
I would need access to the server, yes. I think that if Xvnc were installed on
the server, LDView could connect to that, and everything would then be happy.
(Xvnc is an X Server that's designed to be connected to remotely via vnc. From
LDView's point of view, there would then be an X server, but Xvnc doesn't use a
local screen at all, so the web server is still happy.)
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) I just did a quick check on my own Linux box (a virtual machine, actually) with xvfb (X Virtual Frame Buffer), and that worked fine with LDView. Since xvfb is a standard part of the X distribution, it should be easy to install on most major (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) than we should start thinking about the switch to LDView as render engine ... if this is technically doable. to be frank I didn't understand a single word from all the tech speech above: x server or not, OSMesa a mess ... Travis, I guess you (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
