LUGNET Terms of Use : 287


Administrative / Terms of Use / 287	286 \| 288

Subject:	Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:33:35 GMT
Viewed:	40 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: > by his definition, this was a flog. He said so in > http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=8950: Just to clarify, I wasn't so much agreeing that it was a flog there as I was agreeing that it was, in addition to being a flog, a brag. IMHO. IOW, brag + flog != flog Not that that makes it any better or worse. Just clarifying what I meant. ^^Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
Uhh - I've been seeing that != in a couple of posts. Would some tech jargon junkie remind me what it means? -- Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa4059f.183521...net.com... (...) was (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
(...) I either lied or changed my mind. You decide. (...) Todd has been known to chance his mind, yes. Until he does, let's agree that by his definition, this was a flog. He said so in (URL) Lehman wrote: (...) Since Todd's definition is pretty much (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

33 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search