To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8973
8972  |  8974
Subject: 
Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:38:32 GMT
Viewed: 
4757 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.terms, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> > > In lugnet.admin.general, "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> • writes:
> > > > Thank you, Rose, for taking the time to dig up the links to all of these
> > > > posts... it was very thoughtful to put them in one place for folks to
> > > > look at.
> > > 
> > > I'll second that.
> > 
> > (Responding to my own post.)  YIKES -- it just occurred to me that what I
> > wrote above might be mistaken as a condemnation of what Rose did.  On the
> > contrary, I actually meant it as a _complement_ to Rose.  I thanked Rose
> > this morning via private email for taking the time to dig up all that old
> <snip>
> 
> I'm confused here, I sincerely meant my lead as a thank you to Rose, and I
> took your "I'll second that" as just that, an agreement and your own thanks
> as well. What am I missing here? Why would you think anyone would mistake
> what you said as anything else?
> 
> There are too many wheels within wheels here, I'm starting to think.
> Subtlety is not one of my strong suits. Can someone explain?
> 
> ++Lar

Lar,

That may be because you have the ability to come off as sarcastic even when you
might be sincere. Todd first took it as sincerity then after re-reading he took
it as sarcasm. Perhaps your diction was a little too vague, even I had seen the
two possibilities when reading your thank you to Rose. Not that you have ever
used sarcasm before...

Jude

FUT o-t.debate (cause I don't feel this thread is about .admin anymore)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) <snip> I'm confused here, I sincerely meant my lead as a thank you to Rose, and I took your "I'll second that" as just that, an agreement and your own thanks as well. What am I missing here? Why would you think anyone would mistake what you (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

33 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR