|
In lugnet.admin.general, "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
> > > This post was on topic, it answered a direct question. Hope that helps.
> >
> > In a way, yes, your post answered a question.
> >
> > In a much larger way, it was a flog for your models for sale. And you know
> > it.
>
> No, and no.
++Lar, are you saying that you disagree that your post was a flog? It sure
read like a flog to me, and only after you called it a brag was I able to
see more insight into its purpose and agree that it's more a brag than a
flog. But it's also a flog, IMHO.
> It was a brag. Steve asked who had done killer models and I answered.
There's definitely something to be said for someone who can comfortably
admit that he was bragging.
> > Therefore, IMHO, violates the spirit of the TOS.
>
> No again.
That's a matter of opinion, I think. Now, the tone and the underlying
message of your post probably annoyed the living snot out of dozens of
people, but it didn't technically break the TOS as far as I can tell. Did
it break the spirit of the TOS? That's hard to say, but that's not really
relevant anyway unless you're showing a pattern of trying to walk the line
just for the sake of walking the line. You've shown a history of trying to
walk the line for the sake of flogging and bragging, but not for the sake of
walking the line per se. (Hmm, I wonder which is more destructive to the
community? Certainly neither is positive.)
> > Auction flogging is frowned upon. I can only imagine that sale flogging
> > is frowned upon as well.
>
> You are correct sir, you can only imagine it, you can't cite
I would cite this:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=2907
but that's more of a polite request than a mandate.
There's always someone in the crowd who pushes the limits because they can.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
|
| (...) It's Lar. ++ is the signature lead in, not part of the name. Thanks. (...) Yes, I am specifically saying that I disagree that it was intended to be such. Everything in it was put there to back up my assertion (boast) that the doodlebug is a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|