To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8963
8962  |  8964
Subject: 
Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:33:35 GMT
Viewed: 
5901 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
by his definition, this was a flog.  He said so in
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=8950:

Just to clarify, I wasn't so much agreeing that it was a flog there as I was
agreeing that it was, in addition to being a flog, a brag.  IMHO.

IOW,

   brag + flog != flog

Not that that makes it any better or worse.  Just clarifying what I meant.

^^Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
Uhh - I've been seeing that != in a couple of posts. Would some tech jargon junkie remind me what it means? -- Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa4059f.183521...net.com... (...) was (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) I either lied or changed my mind. You decide. (...) Todd has been known to chance his mind, yes. Until he does, let's agree that by his definition, this was a flog. He said so in (URL) Lehman wrote: (...) Since Todd's definition is pretty much (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

33 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR