|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> by his definition, this was a flog. He said so in
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=8950:
Just to clarify, I wasn't so much agreeing that it was a flog there as I was
agreeing that it was, in addition to being a flog, a brag. IMHO.
IOW,
brag + flog != flog
Not that that makes it any better or worse. Just clarifying what I meant.
^^Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
|
| (...) I either lied or changed my mind. You decide. (...) Todd has been known to chance his mind, yes. Until he does, let's agree that by his definition, this was a flog. He said so in (URL) Lehman wrote: (...) Since Todd's definition is pretty much (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|