To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 288
287  |  289
Subject: 
Defining some written consequences for transgressions of T&C
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:10:35 GMT
Viewed: 
4725 times
  
One thing that the Discussion Group Terms & Conditions here lacks is any
predefined list of actions to be taken if someone commits a transgression of
the T&C.  Here is a proposal...


This is not active site policy but instead a proposal for a future update
to the T&C...  Please comment:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

First offense:  Warning by private email, requiring a response of
acknowlegment of receipt.  Possibly also a warning publicly if the
transgression is particularly flagrant and has upset others.

Second offense:  Suspension of news-posting privileges to the group or
groups in question for not less than one (1) day.

Third offense:  Suspension of news-posting privileges to the group or groups
in question for not less ten (10) days.

Fourth offense:  Suspension of news-posting privileges to the group or
groups in question for not less than one hundred (100) days.

Fifth offense:  Suspension of news-posting privileges to the group or groups
in question for not less than one thousand (1000) days.

and so forth.  (And I doubt there would really be any fourth, much less
fifth or sixth, offenses.  :-)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


The fuzzy parts are of course what is and what is not a transgression, and
what group or groups to bar from if a transgression occurs -- but those are
perennial issues we already face.  This just addresses what to do.

Naturally, there would be separate counters for separate general categories
of transgressions (maybe these would be the numbered points in the T&C?).
For example, if someone posted a flagrant auction flog in the .aquazone
group for the third time, they wouldn't get banned from that group for 100
days if they were breaking some other rule for the first time.

It's so simple.  I like it.  Do you like it?

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Defining some written consequences for transgressions of T&C
 
(...) Yes, it's nice & clean. There's only thing I would recommend doing/adding: 1: stressing (somewhere) that these are 'typical' responses & general procedure, but that LUGNET reserves the right to bypass these guidelines in extreme cases. (If, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
  Re: Defining some written consequences for transgressions of T&C
 
(...) As an evolution of the idea, how about something like an "insurance points" system where transgressions earn you points, and time takes them away. I would hate to see someone who was a real jerk as a kid make it to 4th offense, and then come (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR