Subject:
|
Re: Defining some written consequences for transgressions of T&C
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:57:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4830 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Todd Lehman writes:
> > 2: Take out the "if I don't answer, I never got the warning" twink loophole
> > in your "first offense" guideline.
>
> I meant for that to be covered under "requiring a response of acknowledgment
> of receipt." I guess if someone didn't acknowledge within some period of
> time (24 hours?) it should automatically advance to the next level. Or
> something.
I always found (when I did this for a living) that automatically suspending
service for a non-response worked wonders. And that was for internet service
in general.
Waiting 24 hours for a response, then suspending service until a response came
in via email would probably be reasonable.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
