To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 286
285  |  287
Subject: 
Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:31:00 GMT
Viewed: 
14 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Joslin writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
What I WILL dispute is that any of these are flogs. Unless you define a flog
as the mere mention of something commercial, that is, which is a definition
I dispute. Strongly.

Unfortunately, you aren't the one who gets to define "flog" here.  Todd is, and
he weighed in and agreed that it seemed to be a flog.  So, accept that the post
in question was considered to be a flog, and probably shouldn't have been made
in the form and group it was made in.

I suppose I wasn't totally clear in what I wrote earlier.  Yes, I personally
happen to feel that what (not ++, that's not part of his name)Lar wrote was
a flog (IMHO), but I also added that I thought it was more brag than flog.
To make an analogy, apple juice is more juice than it is apple, or a minivan
is more a van than it is a car, even though it's part car.

But in the final analysis, I don't think it really matters too much because
Lar didn't really break the T&C, so the only thing "bad" or "wrong" that he
did was annoy people, which isn't against the T&C.  A small-scale debate has
ensued here due to the line-toeing, which annoys me and I wish Lar would
knock it off, but I'm not that persuasive.

Anyway, when I weighed in and agreed that it seemed to be a flog, I later
conceded,

   "[...]  It sure read like a flog to me, and only after you called it
    a brag was I able to see more insight into its purpose and agree that
    it's more a brag than a flog.  But it's also a flog, IMHO."

It's a subtle distinction and the burden of mistaken meaning is entirely
mine.  I think we all know a flog when we see one, but this one reached a
new level of ingenuity.

**Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) Unfortunately, you aren't the one who gets to define "flog" here. Todd is, and he weighed in and agreed that it seemed to be a flog. So, accept that the post in question was considered to be a flog, and probably shouldn't have been made in the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)

33 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR