| |
In lugnet.trains, Thomas Stangl writes:
> Steven Barile wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to have a single document that captures the different
> > techniques that various clubs have used for modules. And with that
> > acompaniing pros & cons list by the clubs that use each respective
> > technique. This would be handy for new clubs that are making this decision.
> > As new clubs come online module design should hopefully evolve. PNLTC is
> > continuelly looking for new and inovative modeule design (since Ben is
> > thinking about buying a new car*).
> >
> > There are many considerations in building modules: cost,
> > complelity/difficulty of construction, ease of setup, size, transportation,
> > attaching of skirting, plexi-bariers, wire routing etc...
>
> Right. The reason why I suggested .trains.presentation.hardware
> is that .trains
> can get pretty busy, and it would be nice to slightly compartmentalize while
> fleshing things out. Once all data had been gathered/discussed,
> I definitely see
> it being built as a doc on the ILTCO site.
Trains may well be too busy... Put it in trains.org then. I'm not seeing a
strong argument for a group THIS compartmentalised at this point. And I'm
pretty compartmentalised!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Train Layout Tables
|
| (...) Right. The reason why I suggested .trains.presentation.hardware is that .trains can get pretty busy, and it would be nice to slightly compartmentalize while fleshing things out. Once all data had been gathered/discussed, I definitely see it (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
